Dinosauria

Taxon

285 image(s) · 193 Actualités

Voir la fiche

Galerie d'images

Ареал карнозавров

Ареал карнозавров

Dinosauria Tetanurae
Reconstruction of the theropod dinosaur Tachiraptor admirabilis. Artwork created with graphite and colored pencils. Author: Edwin Chávez "Disfrasaurio".

Reconstruction of the theropod dinosaur Tachiraptor admirabilis. Artwork created with graphite and colored pencils. Author: Edwin Chávez "Disfrasaurio".

Averostra Dinosauria Tachiraptor
Ceratosaurus nasicornis reconstruction. Matches proportions shown in Gregory S. Paul (The Princeton Field Guide to Dinosaurs, 2010, p. 84)

Ceratosaurus nasicornis reconstruction. Matches proportions shown in Gregory S. Paul (The Princeton Field Guide to Dinosaurs, 2010, p. 84)

Averostra Ceratosauria Dinosauria
Sketch-drawing of the vertebrate faunal assemblage of the Lisowice site (modified from Niedźwiedzki)10. (a) Large, theropod-like predatory archosaur (Smok wawelski); (b) large temnospondyl amphibian (Cyclotosaurus sp.); (c) small predatory dinosaurs (Neotheropoda indet.); (d) temnospondyl amphibian (Gerrothorax sp.); (e) small basal crocodylomorph (Crocodylomorpha indet.); (f) small diapsid (Choristodere-like animal); (g) hybodont sharks (Polyacrodus and Hybodus); (h) coelacanth fish; (i) dipnoan fish (Ptychoceratodus sp.); (j) actinopterygian fish; (k) gigantic dicynodont; (l) dinosauriforms or early dinosaurs (Dinosauriformes indet. or Dinosauria indet.); (m) small lepidosauromorphs (Sphenodontia indet.); (n) pterosaurs (Pterosauria indet.); (o) early mammaliaform (Hallautherium sp.).

Sketch-drawing of the vertebrate faunal assemblage of the Lisowice site (modified from Niedźwiedzki)10. (a) Large, theropod-like predatory archosaur (Smok wawelski); (b) large temnospondyl amphibian (Cyclotosaurus sp.); (c) small predatory dinosaurs (Neotheropoda indet.); (d) temnospondyl amphibian (Gerrothorax sp.); (e) small basal crocodylomorph (Crocodylomorpha indet.); (f) small diapsid (Choristodere-like animal); (g) hybodont sharks (Polyacrodus and Hybodus); (h) coelacanth fish; (i) dipnoan fish (Ptychoceratodus sp.); (j) actinopterygian fish; (k) gigantic dicynodont; (l) dinosauriforms or early dinosaurs (Dinosauriformes indet. or Dinosauria indet.); (m) small lepidosauromorphs (Sphenodontia indet.); (n) pterosaurs (Pterosauria indet.); (o) early mammaliaform (Hallautherium sp.).

dessin Dinosauria Neotheropoda Pterosauria
Diagram made to illustrate the debate over the hands of theropod dinosaurs and their alleged descendants, the birds ( Aves ). In the last years, the difference between the hands of theropods and birds have been an important thing when it comes question the theory that birds evolved from dinosaurs, even though some scientists may could refute it. In the diagram, a Neotheropoda ( 1 ), basal tetanurae ( 2 ), a coelurosaurian ( 3 ), the bird (?)Archaeopteryx ( 4 ) and modern bird ( 5 ).
In 1997, birdexpert Alan Feduccia at University of North Carolina discovered that birds develop hands with the digits II, III and IV ( see The Cincinnati Enquirer, 25 - 10 - 1997 ). This is in contrast with the hands of tetanurae, which seems to have the digits I, II and III. This make it almost impossible for dinosaurs and birds to be closely related, according to Feduccia.
Since the discovery by Feduccia, scientific research have came up with a possible explanation to the mystery of the dinosaur - bird hand difference, called The frame shift hypothesis ( see http://scienceblogs.com/tetrapodzoology/2009/06/limusaurus_is_awesome.php ). This hypothesis is based on a discovery which shows that although bird embryos develop the fingers II, III and IV, the genes which is coding for the external appearance of the digits seems to be from the fingers I, II and III. Based on this, scientists belive this: when neotheropods evolved into tetanurae, the losed digit I ( not digit IV, as earlier suggested ). During this process, the genes which coded for how the digits should looks like ( the number of phalanges, for example ) became refurnished ( see the color spots in th upper section in the diagram to understan ). The discovery of Limusaurus has been said to support this theory ( see https://www.livescience.com/animals/090617-dinosaur-hands.html ).
One thing is that may can be used to refute that Limusaurus should support the Frame shift hypothesis is that Limusaurus was a ceratosaurian, and is dated to be much younger than the oldest tetanurae's.
Also, some tetanure´s may had 4 digits' like the Archaeornithomimus ( see number 4 in the diagram ) ( see also http://dml.cmnh.org/1998Oct/msg00443.html and the Allosaurus hand in the image here: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/6/69/Allosaurus-mounted.jpg ). If this is the digits I, II, III and IV. If so, it shows that tetanurae had the digits I, II and III, and not II, II and IV, like birds.
For more in this debate, see text section to my picture Raptor-Archaeopteryx-bird hands differens.JPG at http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Raptor-Archaeopteryx-bird_hands_differens.JPG.

Diagram made to illustrate the debate over the hands of theropod dinosaurs and their alleged descendants, the birds ( Aves ). In the last years, the difference between the hands of theropods and birds have been an important thing when it comes question the theory that birds evolved from dinosaurs, even though some scientists may could refute it. In the diagram, a Neotheropoda ( 1 ), basal tetanurae ( 2 ), a coelurosaurian ( 3 ), the bird (?)Archaeopteryx ( 4 ) and modern bird ( 5 ). In 1997, birdexpert Alan Feduccia at University of North Carolina discovered that birds develop hands with the digits II, III and IV ( see The Cincinnati Enquirer, 25 - 10 - 1997 ). This is in contrast with the hands of tetanurae, which seems to have the digits I, II and III. This make it almost impossible for dinosaurs and birds to be closely related, according to Feduccia. Since the discovery by Feduccia, scientific research have came up with a possible explanation to the mystery of the dinosaur - bird hand difference, called The frame shift hypothesis ( see http://scienceblogs.com/tetrapodzoology/2009/06/limusaurus_is_awesome.php ). This hypothesis is based on a discovery which shows that although bird embryos develop the fingers II, III and IV, the genes which is coding for the external appearance of the digits seems to be from the fingers I, II and III. Based on this, scientists belive this: when neotheropods evolved into tetanurae, the losed digit I ( not digit IV, as earlier suggested ). During this process, the genes which coded for how the digits should looks like ( the number of phalanges, for example ) became refurnished ( see the color spots in th upper section in the diagram to understan ). The discovery of Limusaurus has been said to support this theory ( see https://www.livescience.com/animals/090617-dinosaur-hands.html ). One thing is that may can be used to refute that Limusaurus should support the Frame shift hypothesis is that Limusaurus was a ceratosaurian, and is dated to be much younger than the oldest tetanurae's. Also, some tetanure´s may had 4 digits' like the Archaeornithomimus ( see number 4 in the diagram ) ( see also http://dml.cmnh.org/1998Oct/msg00443.html and the Allosaurus hand in the image here: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/6/69/Allosaurus-mounted.jpg ). If this is the digits I, II, III and IV. If so, it shows that tetanurae had the digits I, II and III, and not II, II and IV, like birds. For more in this debate, see text section to my picture Raptor-Archaeopteryx-bird hands differens.JPG at http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Raptor-Archaeopteryx-bird_hands_differens.JPG.

Archaeopteryx Coelurosauria Dinosauria Neotheropoda +3
Cladogram of amniotes. Based on File:Cladogram Amniota A.jpg

Cladogram of amniotes. Based on File:Cladogram Amniota A.jpg

Coelurosauria Dinosauria Maniraptora Ornithischia +2
Cladogram of the former "Reptilia" (red)

Cladogram of the former "Reptilia" (red)

Coelurosauria Dinosauria Maniraptora Ornithischia +2
Dinosaur art by me!

Dinosaur art by me!

Dinosauria
The Chicago specimen of Archaeopteryx (PA 830), a well-preserved fossil highlighting the transitional features between non-avian dinosaurs and birds, housed at the Field Museum of Natural History.

The Chicago specimen of Archaeopteryx (PA 830), a well-preserved fossil highlighting the transitional features between non-avian dinosaurs and birds, housed at the Field Museum of Natural History.

musée fossile spécimen Archaeopteryx +2
Life representation of Bicharracosaurus dionidei

Life representation of Bicharracosaurus dionidei

Bicharracosaurus Dinosauria
A badly drew sketch of Brontoholus (a placeholder for when an actual paleoart of Brontotholus is made.

A badly drew sketch of Brontoholus (a placeholder for when an actual paleoart of Brontotholus is made.

paléoart Brontotholus Dinosauria
Archeology center interior Svilajnac

Archeology center interior Svilajnac

Dinosauria
Apex Stegosaurus Reconstruction drawn Jan, 7, 2025 by Adam Treviño

Apex Stegosaurus Reconstruction drawn Jan, 7, 2025 by Adam Treviño

Dinosauria Stegosauria
Anteavis

Anteavis

Anteavis Dinosauria
Dinosaur art by me!

Dinosaur art by me!

Dinosauria
A scientifically accurate reconstruction of the dinosaur Spinosaurus aegyptiacus.

A scientifically accurate reconstruction of the dinosaur Spinosaurus aegyptiacus.

Dinosauria Spinosauria
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

Actualités

Why Were There No Tiny Non-Avian Dinosaurs? Mammals May Have Been to Blame
Pourquoi n’y avait-il pas de petits dinosaures non aviaires ? Les mammifères pourraient être à blâmer
écologie prédateur reproduction Dinosauria évolution mammifères
Les dinosaures ont évolué pour devenir certains des plus grands animaux ayant jamais foulé la Terre, mais un nouveau modèle mathématique suggère que les premiers mammifères les auraient chassés des niches écologiques réservées aux plus petites créatures. Cet article, intitulé « Pourquoi n'y avait-il pas de minuscules dinosaures non aviens ? Les mammifères en seraient-ils responsables ? », a été initialement publié sur Sci.News: Breaking Science News.
10/08/2026 sci-news ⚙ Traduction automatique
Un fossile de reptile vieux de 240 millions d'années révèle un chapitre perdu avant les dinosaures et les crocodiles
prédateur Brésil Trias fossile Dinosauria évolution autres reptiles
Un reptile vieux de 240 millions d'années découvert au Brésil révèle à quoi ressemblait l'évolution juste avant l'avènement des dinosaures et des crocodiles. Le petit prédateur avait des pattes inhabituellement positionnées qui lui permettaient peut-être de se déplacer plus efficacement que de nombreux reptiles antérieurs. Ses proches parents étaient auparavant connus principalement sur d’autres continents, ce qui suggère que ces animaux anciens se sont répandus beaucoup plus loin dans le monde du Trias que les scientifiques ne le pensaient.
10/08/2026 sciencedaily ⚙ Traduction automatique
Les dinosaures sont devenus des géants – alors pourquoi ne sont-ils jamais devenus minuscules ?
écologie croissance Dinosauria évolution mammifères
Les dinosaures ont conquis la terre à des tailles énormes, mais étrangement, ils n'ont presque jamais évolué pour devenir de véritables animaux minuscules. De nouvelles recherches suggèrent que la physiologie à elle seule ne peut pas expliquer cette extrémité miniature manquante du spectre des dinosaures et que les premiers mammifères pourraient en être en partie responsables. Alors que les dinosaures empêchaient les mammifères de devenir grands, les petits mammifères pourraient leur rendre la pareille en occupant des niches écologiques qui auraient autrement pu accueillir des dinosaures de la taille d'une souris.
09/08/2026 sciencedaily ⚙ Traduction automatique
Un magnifique dinosaure en origami présenté à Everything Dinosaur
Dinosauria
Everything Dinosaur soutenir la créativité des fans d'animaux préhistoriques est un objectif clé de l'entreprise.  Nous rencontrons tellement de personnes talentueuses et extraordinaires et nous faisons tout ce que nous pouvons pour les encourager à poursuivre leurs rêves.  Par exemple, lors de la DinoCon le mois dernier, Sue et moi avons reçu un magnifique dinosaure en origami. UN
08/08/2026 everythingdinosaur ⚙ Traduction automatique
New Troodontid Dinosaur Genus Identified from Fossil Bone Found Decades Ago in New Mexico
Un nouveau genre de dinosaure troodontidé identifié à partir d'un os fossile découvert il y a plusieurs décennies au Nouveau-Mexique
os Mexique fossile Dinevenator Dinosauria Troodontidae oiseau
Les paléontologues ont décrit un nouveau genre de petit dinosaure ressemblant à un oiseau qui vivait dans ce qui est aujourd'hui le Nouveau-Mexique il y a environ 73 millions d'années. L'article Nouveau genre de dinosaures troodontidés identifié à partir d'os fossiles trouvés il y a des décennies au Nouveau-Mexique est apparu en premier sur Sci.News : Breaking Science News.
07/08/2026 sci-news ⚙ Traduction automatique
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39