←

Dinosauria

Taxon

251 image(s) · 248 Actualités

Voir la fiche

Galerie d'images

Montage of eight different representatives of coelurosaurian dinosaurs: (Clockwise from upper left) GIN 100/42 which may represent Citipati or a different oviraptorosaur, Sinosauropteryx prima, Nothronychus mckinleyi, Tyrannosaurus rex, Bambiraptor feinbergi, Passer domesticus, Struthiomimus altus, Microraptor gui. This is a collection of eight different works already found in Wikimedia Commons (see source field below).

Montage of eight different representatives of coelurosaurian dinosaurs: (Clockwise from upper left) GIN 100/42 which may represent Citipati or a different oviraptorosaur, Sinosauropteryx prima, Nothronychus mckinleyi, Tyrannosaurus rex, Bambiraptor feinbergi, Passer domesticus, Struthiomimus altus, Microraptor gui. This is a collection of eight different works already found in Wikimedia Commons (see source field below).

Bambiraptor Citipati Coelurosauria Dinosauria +6
Simplified cladogram of Dinosauria with the distribution of feathers according to the fossil record. Despite its more ancient origin, it
was only in maniraptoriformes that modern-type feathers (pennaceous feathers) have arisen (Based in Xu & Guo, 2009; Clarke,

2013; Godefroit et al., 2013; Han et al., 2014; Koshchowitz et al., 2014).

Simplified cladogram of Dinosauria with the distribution of feathers according to the fossil record. Despite its more ancient origin, it was only in maniraptoriformes that modern-type feathers (pennaceous feathers) have arisen (Based in Xu & Guo, 2009; Clarke, 2013; Godefroit et al., 2013; Han et al., 2014; Koshchowitz et al., 2014).

plume fossile Dinosauria Maniraptoriformes +1
Ареал карнозавров

Ареал карнозавров

Dinosauria Tetanurae
Reconstruction of the theropod dinosaur Tachiraptor admirabilis. Artwork created with graphite and colored pencils. Author: Edwin Chávez "Disfrasaurio".

Reconstruction of the theropod dinosaur Tachiraptor admirabilis. Artwork created with graphite and colored pencils. Author: Edwin Chávez "Disfrasaurio".

Averostra Dinosauria Tachiraptor
Ceratosaurus nasicornis reconstruction. Matches proportions shown in Gregory S. Paul (The Princeton Field Guide to Dinosaurs, 2010, p. 84)

Ceratosaurus nasicornis reconstruction. Matches proportions shown in Gregory S. Paul (The Princeton Field Guide to Dinosaurs, 2010, p. 84)

Averostra Ceratosauria Dinosauria
Sketch-drawing of the vertebrate faunal assemblage of the Lisowice site (modified from Niedźwiedzki)10. (a) Large, theropod-like predatory archosaur (Smok wawelski); (b) large temnospondyl amphibian (Cyclotosaurus sp.); (c) small predatory dinosaurs (Neotheropoda indet.); (d) temnospondyl amphibian (Gerrothorax sp.); (e) small basal crocodylomorph (Crocodylomorpha indet.); (f) small diapsid (Choristodere-like animal); (g) hybodont sharks (Polyacrodus and Hybodus); (h) coelacanth fish; (i) dipnoan fish (Ptychoceratodus sp.); (j) actinopterygian fish; (k) gigantic dicynodont; (l) dinosauriforms or early dinosaurs (Dinosauriformes indet. or Dinosauria indet.); (m) small lepidosauromorphs (Sphenodontia indet.); (n) pterosaurs (Pterosauria indet.); (o) early mammaliaform (Hallautherium sp.).

Sketch-drawing of the vertebrate faunal assemblage of the Lisowice site (modified from Niedźwiedzki)10. (a) Large, theropod-like predatory archosaur (Smok wawelski); (b) large temnospondyl amphibian (Cyclotosaurus sp.); (c) small predatory dinosaurs (Neotheropoda indet.); (d) temnospondyl amphibian (Gerrothorax sp.); (e) small basal crocodylomorph (Crocodylomorpha indet.); (f) small diapsid (Choristodere-like animal); (g) hybodont sharks (Polyacrodus and Hybodus); (h) coelacanth fish; (i) dipnoan fish (Ptychoceratodus sp.); (j) actinopterygian fish; (k) gigantic dicynodont; (l) dinosauriforms or early dinosaurs (Dinosauriformes indet. or Dinosauria indet.); (m) small lepidosauromorphs (Sphenodontia indet.); (n) pterosaurs (Pterosauria indet.); (o) early mammaliaform (Hallautherium sp.).

dessin Dinosauria Neotheropoda Pterosauria
Diagram made to illustrate the debate over the hands of theropod dinosaurs and their alleged descendants, the birds ( Aves ). In the last years, the difference between the hands of theropods and birds have been an important thing when it comes question the theory that birds evolved from dinosaurs, even though some scientists may could refute it. In the diagram, a Neotheropoda ( 1 ), basal tetanurae ( 2 ), a coelurosaurian ( 3 ), the bird (?)Archaeopteryx ( 4 ) and modern bird ( 5 ).
In 1997, birdexpert Alan Feduccia at University of North Carolina discovered that birds develop hands with the digits II, III and IV ( see The Cincinnati Enquirer, 25 - 10 - 1997 ). This is in contrast with the hands of tetanurae, which seems to have the digits I, II and III. This make it almost impossible for dinosaurs and birds to be closely related, according to Feduccia.
Since the discovery by Feduccia, scientific research have came up with a possible explanation to the mystery of the dinosaur - bird hand difference, called The frame shift hypothesis ( see http://scienceblogs.com/tetrapodzoology/2009/06/limusaurus_is_awesome.php ). This hypothesis is based on a discovery which shows that although bird embryos develop the fingers II, III and IV, the genes which is coding for the external appearance of the digits seems to be from the fingers I, II and III. Based on this, scientists belive this: when neotheropods evolved into tetanurae, the losed digit I ( not digit IV, as earlier suggested ). During this process, the genes which coded for how the digits should looks like ( the number of phalanges, for example ) became refurnished ( see the color spots in th upper section in the diagram to understan ). The discovery of Limusaurus has been said to support this theory ( see https://www.livescience.com/animals/090617-dinosaur-hands.html ).
One thing is that may can be used to refute that Limusaurus should support the Frame shift hypothesis is that Limusaurus was a ceratosaurian, and is dated to be much younger than the oldest tetanurae's.
Also, some tetanure´s may had 4 digits' like the Archaeornithomimus ( see number 4 in the diagram ) ( see also http://dml.cmnh.org/1998Oct/msg00443.html and the Allosaurus hand in the image here: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/6/69/Allosaurus-mounted.jpg ). If this is the digits I, II, III and IV. If so, it shows that tetanurae had the digits I, II and III, and not II, II and IV, like birds.
For more in this debate, see text section to my picture Raptor-Archaeopteryx-bird hands differens.JPG at http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Raptor-Archaeopteryx-bird_hands_differens.JPG.

Diagram made to illustrate the debate over the hands of theropod dinosaurs and their alleged descendants, the birds ( Aves ). In the last years, the difference between the hands of theropods and birds have been an important thing when it comes question the theory that birds evolved from dinosaurs, even though some scientists may could refute it. In the diagram, a Neotheropoda ( 1 ), basal tetanurae ( 2 ), a coelurosaurian ( 3 ), the bird (?)Archaeopteryx ( 4 ) and modern bird ( 5 ). In 1997, birdexpert Alan Feduccia at University of North Carolina discovered that birds develop hands with the digits II, III and IV ( see The Cincinnati Enquirer, 25 - 10 - 1997 ). This is in contrast with the hands of tetanurae, which seems to have the digits I, II and III. This make it almost impossible for dinosaurs and birds to be closely related, according to Feduccia. Since the discovery by Feduccia, scientific research have came up with a possible explanation to the mystery of the dinosaur - bird hand difference, called The frame shift hypothesis ( see http://scienceblogs.com/tetrapodzoology/2009/06/limusaurus_is_awesome.php ). This hypothesis is based on a discovery which shows that although bird embryos develop the fingers II, III and IV, the genes which is coding for the external appearance of the digits seems to be from the fingers I, II and III. Based on this, scientists belive this: when neotheropods evolved into tetanurae, the losed digit I ( not digit IV, as earlier suggested ). During this process, the genes which coded for how the digits should looks like ( the number of phalanges, for example ) became refurnished ( see the color spots in th upper section in the diagram to understan ). The discovery of Limusaurus has been said to support this theory ( see https://www.livescience.com/animals/090617-dinosaur-hands.html ). One thing is that may can be used to refute that Limusaurus should support the Frame shift hypothesis is that Limusaurus was a ceratosaurian, and is dated to be much younger than the oldest tetanurae's. Also, some tetanure´s may had 4 digits' like the Archaeornithomimus ( see number 4 in the diagram ) ( see also http://dml.cmnh.org/1998Oct/msg00443.html and the Allosaurus hand in the image here: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/6/69/Allosaurus-mounted.jpg ). If this is the digits I, II, III and IV. If so, it shows that tetanurae had the digits I, II and III, and not II, II and IV, like birds. For more in this debate, see text section to my picture Raptor-Archaeopteryx-bird hands differens.JPG at http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Raptor-Archaeopteryx-bird_hands_differens.JPG.

Archaeopteryx Coelurosauria Dinosauria Neotheropoda +3
Cladogram of amniotes. Based on File:Cladogram Amniota A.jpg

Cladogram of amniotes. Based on File:Cladogram Amniota A.jpg

Coelurosauria Dinosauria Maniraptora Ornithischia +2
Cladogram of the former "Reptilia" (red)

Cladogram of the former "Reptilia" (red)

Coelurosauria Dinosauria Maniraptora Ornithischia +2
Dinosaur art by me!

Dinosaur art by me!

Dinosauria
The Chicago specimen of Archaeopteryx (PA 830), a well-preserved fossil highlighting the transitional features between non-avian dinosaurs and birds, housed at the Field Museum of Natural History.

The Chicago specimen of Archaeopteryx (PA 830), a well-preserved fossil highlighting the transitional features between non-avian dinosaurs and birds, housed at the Field Museum of Natural History.

musée fossile spécimen Archaeopteryx +2
Life representation of Bicharracosaurus dionidei

Life representation of Bicharracosaurus dionidei

Bicharracosaurus Dinosauria
A badly drew sketch of Brontoholus (a placeholder for when an actual paleoart of Brontotholus is made.

A badly drew sketch of Brontoholus (a placeholder for when an actual paleoart of Brontotholus is made.

paléoart Brontotholus Dinosauria
Archeology center interior Svilajnac

Archeology center interior Svilajnac

Dinosauria
Apex Stegosaurus Reconstruction drawn Jan, 7, 2025 by Adam Treviño

Apex Stegosaurus Reconstruction drawn Jan, 7, 2025 by Adam Treviño

Dinosauria Stegosauria
Anteavis

Anteavis

Anteavis Dinosauria
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16

Actualités

Un voyage inspirant en paléontologie avec Jessica Lippincott
description Jurassique fossile Dinosauria étude
La paléontologue Jessica Lippincott n'a pas grandi en planifiant une carrière dans l'étude des fossiles. En fait, son remarquable voyage en paléontologie a commencé presque par hasard. Everything Dinosaur a récemment rendu compte de la description scientifique de la bélemnite jurassique inhabituelle et volumineuse Wyoteuthis linsterorum. Jessica était l'une des chercheuses impliquées dans l'étude. C'est pourquoi nous avons demandé à l'organisme basé au Wyoming
14/09/2026 everythingdinosaur ⚙ Traduction automatique
Muttaburrasaurus: Beast of the Week
Muttaburrasaurus : Bête de la semaine
Australie Crétacé fossile Dinosauria Muttaburrasaurus
 Cette semaine, nous allons découvrir un mystérieux dinosaure herbivore qui habitait autrefois l'Australie.  Entrez Muttaburrasaurus langdoni ! Muttaburrasaurus était un dinosaure herbivore qui vivait dans ce qui est aujourd'hui le nord de l'Australie pendant la période du Crétacé précoce et moyen, il y a entre 103 et 113 millions d'années.  Du museau à la queue, il mesurait environ 7 mètres de long.  Son nom se traduit par "Muttaburra Reptile/Lizard" en référence à la partie du Queensland en Australie où l'on trouve ses fossiles.
13/09/2026 prehistoricbeastoftheweek ⚙ Traduction automatique
Le T. rex n’était pas qu’une brute : son cerveau aurait pu lui permettre de résoudre des problèmes et même d’utiliser des outils
Le T. rex n’était pas qu’une brute : son cerveau aurait pu lui permettre de résoudre des problèmes et même d’utiliser des outils
Dinosauria Tyrannosaurus
Un tyrannosaure aussi malin qu'un babouin, capable d'utiliser des outils et de transmettre des savoirs : l'hypothèse a fait le tour du monde en 2023. Une équipe internationale l'a passée au crible, aboutissant à une estimation dix fois inférieure. Le débat porte moins sur les dinosaures que sur...
12/09/2026 futura-terre
Achetez des modèles de dinosaures en ligne : cinq conseils essentiels pour les collectionneurs
Dinosauria étude
Il n'a jamais été aussi simple d'acheter des modèles de dinosaures en ligne. Cependant, avec autant de figurines d’animaux préhistoriques disponibles, comment les collectionneurs et les fans de dinosaures peuvent-ils choisir judicieusement ? Voici cinq points utiles à considérer. (1) Regardez attentivement le modèle. Tout d'abord, étudiez les photographies de la figurine réelle. Vérifiez la pose, la palette de couleurs et le niveau de détail.
12/09/2026 everythingdinosaur ⚙ Traduction automatique
Une plume vieille de 66 millions d'années dans les crottes de dinosaures pourrait révéler pourquoi les oiseaux ont survécu à l'astéroïde
plume Dinosauria oiseau
Une plume découverte dans des crottes de dinosaures fossilisés vieilles de 66 millions d’années pourrait aider à expliquer pourquoi les oiseaux modernes ont survécu à la catastrophe de l’astéroïde. L’oiseau disparu dont il est issu avait des plumes isolantes plus primitives, ce qui suggère qu’un plumage supérieur aurait pu aider les ancêtres des oiseaux vivants à supporter l’impact mortel de l’hiver.
11/09/2026 sciencedaily ⚙ Traduction automatique
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50