←

Dinosauria

Taxon

251 image(s) · 248 Actualités

Voir la fiche

Galerie d'images

Montage of eight different representatives of coelurosaurian dinosaurs: (Clockwise from upper left) GIN 100/42 which may represent Citipati or a different oviraptorosaur, Sinosauropteryx prima, Nothronychus mckinleyi, Tyrannosaurus rex, Bambiraptor feinbergi, Passer domesticus, Struthiomimus altus, Microraptor gui. This is a collection of eight different works already found in Wikimedia Commons (see source field below).

Montage of eight different representatives of coelurosaurian dinosaurs: (Clockwise from upper left) GIN 100/42 which may represent Citipati or a different oviraptorosaur, Sinosauropteryx prima, Nothronychus mckinleyi, Tyrannosaurus rex, Bambiraptor feinbergi, Passer domesticus, Struthiomimus altus, Microraptor gui. This is a collection of eight different works already found in Wikimedia Commons (see source field below).

Bambiraptor Citipati Coelurosauria Dinosauria +6
Simplified cladogram of Dinosauria with the distribution of feathers according to the fossil record. Despite its more ancient origin, it
was only in maniraptoriformes that modern-type feathers (pennaceous feathers) have arisen (Based in Xu & Guo, 2009; Clarke,

2013; Godefroit et al., 2013; Han et al., 2014; Koshchowitz et al., 2014).

Simplified cladogram of Dinosauria with the distribution of feathers according to the fossil record. Despite its more ancient origin, it was only in maniraptoriformes that modern-type feathers (pennaceous feathers) have arisen (Based in Xu & Guo, 2009; Clarke, 2013; Godefroit et al., 2013; Han et al., 2014; Koshchowitz et al., 2014).

plume fossile Dinosauria Maniraptoriformes +1
Ареал карнозавров

Ареал карнозавров

Dinosauria Tetanurae
Reconstruction of the theropod dinosaur Tachiraptor admirabilis. Artwork created with graphite and colored pencils. Author: Edwin Chávez "Disfrasaurio".

Reconstruction of the theropod dinosaur Tachiraptor admirabilis. Artwork created with graphite and colored pencils. Author: Edwin Chávez "Disfrasaurio".

Averostra Dinosauria Tachiraptor
Ceratosaurus nasicornis reconstruction. Matches proportions shown in Gregory S. Paul (The Princeton Field Guide to Dinosaurs, 2010, p. 84)

Ceratosaurus nasicornis reconstruction. Matches proportions shown in Gregory S. Paul (The Princeton Field Guide to Dinosaurs, 2010, p. 84)

Averostra Ceratosauria Dinosauria
Sketch-drawing of the vertebrate faunal assemblage of the Lisowice site (modified from Niedźwiedzki)10. (a) Large, theropod-like predatory archosaur (Smok wawelski); (b) large temnospondyl amphibian (Cyclotosaurus sp.); (c) small predatory dinosaurs (Neotheropoda indet.); (d) temnospondyl amphibian (Gerrothorax sp.); (e) small basal crocodylomorph (Crocodylomorpha indet.); (f) small diapsid (Choristodere-like animal); (g) hybodont sharks (Polyacrodus and Hybodus); (h) coelacanth fish; (i) dipnoan fish (Ptychoceratodus sp.); (j) actinopterygian fish; (k) gigantic dicynodont; (l) dinosauriforms or early dinosaurs (Dinosauriformes indet. or Dinosauria indet.); (m) small lepidosauromorphs (Sphenodontia indet.); (n) pterosaurs (Pterosauria indet.); (o) early mammaliaform (Hallautherium sp.).

Sketch-drawing of the vertebrate faunal assemblage of the Lisowice site (modified from Niedźwiedzki)10. (a) Large, theropod-like predatory archosaur (Smok wawelski); (b) large temnospondyl amphibian (Cyclotosaurus sp.); (c) small predatory dinosaurs (Neotheropoda indet.); (d) temnospondyl amphibian (Gerrothorax sp.); (e) small basal crocodylomorph (Crocodylomorpha indet.); (f) small diapsid (Choristodere-like animal); (g) hybodont sharks (Polyacrodus and Hybodus); (h) coelacanth fish; (i) dipnoan fish (Ptychoceratodus sp.); (j) actinopterygian fish; (k) gigantic dicynodont; (l) dinosauriforms or early dinosaurs (Dinosauriformes indet. or Dinosauria indet.); (m) small lepidosauromorphs (Sphenodontia indet.); (n) pterosaurs (Pterosauria indet.); (o) early mammaliaform (Hallautherium sp.).

dessin Dinosauria Neotheropoda Pterosauria
Diagram made to illustrate the debate over the hands of theropod dinosaurs and their alleged descendants, the birds ( Aves ). In the last years, the difference between the hands of theropods and birds have been an important thing when it comes question the theory that birds evolved from dinosaurs, even though some scientists may could refute it. In the diagram, a Neotheropoda ( 1 ), basal tetanurae ( 2 ), a coelurosaurian ( 3 ), the bird (?)Archaeopteryx ( 4 ) and modern bird ( 5 ).
In 1997, birdexpert Alan Feduccia at University of North Carolina discovered that birds develop hands with the digits II, III and IV ( see The Cincinnati Enquirer, 25 - 10 - 1997 ). This is in contrast with the hands of tetanurae, which seems to have the digits I, II and III. This make it almost impossible for dinosaurs and birds to be closely related, according to Feduccia.
Since the discovery by Feduccia, scientific research have came up with a possible explanation to the mystery of the dinosaur - bird hand difference, called The frame shift hypothesis ( see http://scienceblogs.com/tetrapodzoology/2009/06/limusaurus_is_awesome.php ). This hypothesis is based on a discovery which shows that although bird embryos develop the fingers II, III and IV, the genes which is coding for the external appearance of the digits seems to be from the fingers I, II and III. Based on this, scientists belive this: when neotheropods evolved into tetanurae, the losed digit I ( not digit IV, as earlier suggested ). During this process, the genes which coded for how the digits should looks like ( the number of phalanges, for example ) became refurnished ( see the color spots in th upper section in the diagram to understan ). The discovery of Limusaurus has been said to support this theory ( see https://www.livescience.com/animals/090617-dinosaur-hands.html ).
One thing is that may can be used to refute that Limusaurus should support the Frame shift hypothesis is that Limusaurus was a ceratosaurian, and is dated to be much younger than the oldest tetanurae's.
Also, some tetanure´s may had 4 digits' like the Archaeornithomimus ( see number 4 in the diagram ) ( see also http://dml.cmnh.org/1998Oct/msg00443.html and the Allosaurus hand in the image here: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/6/69/Allosaurus-mounted.jpg ). If this is the digits I, II, III and IV. If so, it shows that tetanurae had the digits I, II and III, and not II, II and IV, like birds.
For more in this debate, see text section to my picture Raptor-Archaeopteryx-bird hands differens.JPG at http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Raptor-Archaeopteryx-bird_hands_differens.JPG.

Diagram made to illustrate the debate over the hands of theropod dinosaurs and their alleged descendants, the birds ( Aves ). In the last years, the difference between the hands of theropods and birds have been an important thing when it comes question the theory that birds evolved from dinosaurs, even though some scientists may could refute it. In the diagram, a Neotheropoda ( 1 ), basal tetanurae ( 2 ), a coelurosaurian ( 3 ), the bird (?)Archaeopteryx ( 4 ) and modern bird ( 5 ). In 1997, birdexpert Alan Feduccia at University of North Carolina discovered that birds develop hands with the digits II, III and IV ( see The Cincinnati Enquirer, 25 - 10 - 1997 ). This is in contrast with the hands of tetanurae, which seems to have the digits I, II and III. This make it almost impossible for dinosaurs and birds to be closely related, according to Feduccia. Since the discovery by Feduccia, scientific research have came up with a possible explanation to the mystery of the dinosaur - bird hand difference, called The frame shift hypothesis ( see http://scienceblogs.com/tetrapodzoology/2009/06/limusaurus_is_awesome.php ). This hypothesis is based on a discovery which shows that although bird embryos develop the fingers II, III and IV, the genes which is coding for the external appearance of the digits seems to be from the fingers I, II and III. Based on this, scientists belive this: when neotheropods evolved into tetanurae, the losed digit I ( not digit IV, as earlier suggested ). During this process, the genes which coded for how the digits should looks like ( the number of phalanges, for example ) became refurnished ( see the color spots in th upper section in the diagram to understan ). The discovery of Limusaurus has been said to support this theory ( see https://www.livescience.com/animals/090617-dinosaur-hands.html ). One thing is that may can be used to refute that Limusaurus should support the Frame shift hypothesis is that Limusaurus was a ceratosaurian, and is dated to be much younger than the oldest tetanurae's. Also, some tetanure´s may had 4 digits' like the Archaeornithomimus ( see number 4 in the diagram ) ( see also http://dml.cmnh.org/1998Oct/msg00443.html and the Allosaurus hand in the image here: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/6/69/Allosaurus-mounted.jpg ). If this is the digits I, II, III and IV. If so, it shows that tetanurae had the digits I, II and III, and not II, II and IV, like birds. For more in this debate, see text section to my picture Raptor-Archaeopteryx-bird hands differens.JPG at http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Raptor-Archaeopteryx-bird_hands_differens.JPG.

Archaeopteryx Coelurosauria Dinosauria Neotheropoda +3
Cladogram of amniotes. Based on File:Cladogram Amniota A.jpg

Cladogram of amniotes. Based on File:Cladogram Amniota A.jpg

Coelurosauria Dinosauria Maniraptora Ornithischia +2
Cladogram of the former "Reptilia" (red)

Cladogram of the former "Reptilia" (red)

Coelurosauria Dinosauria Maniraptora Ornithischia +2
Dinosaur art by me!

Dinosaur art by me!

Dinosauria
The Chicago specimen of Archaeopteryx (PA 830), a well-preserved fossil highlighting the transitional features between non-avian dinosaurs and birds, housed at the Field Museum of Natural History.

The Chicago specimen of Archaeopteryx (PA 830), a well-preserved fossil highlighting the transitional features between non-avian dinosaurs and birds, housed at the Field Museum of Natural History.

musée fossile spécimen Archaeopteryx +2
Life representation of Bicharracosaurus dionidei

Life representation of Bicharracosaurus dionidei

Bicharracosaurus Dinosauria
A badly drew sketch of Brontoholus (a placeholder for when an actual paleoart of Brontotholus is made.

A badly drew sketch of Brontoholus (a placeholder for when an actual paleoart of Brontotholus is made.

paléoart Brontotholus Dinosauria
Archeology center interior Svilajnac

Archeology center interior Svilajnac

Dinosauria
Apex Stegosaurus Reconstruction drawn Jan, 7, 2025 by Adam Treviño

Apex Stegosaurus Reconstruction drawn Jan, 7, 2025 by Adam Treviño

Dinosauria Stegosauria
Anteavis

Anteavis

Anteavis Dinosauria
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16

Actualités

Dessin exclusif à l’échelle du spinosaure célébrant une nouvelle espèce
écaille dessin Niger Dinosauria Spinosauria Spinosauridae formation nouvelle espèce
Everything Dinosaur a commandé un dessin à l'échelle de Spinosaurus mirabilis alors que la société se prépare à l'arrivée des nouveaux modèles Haolonggood S. mirabilis.  Cette illustration sera utilisée dans la fiche d'information de la société sur ce spinosauridé récemment décrit et connu de la Formation Farak au Niger (Afrique).  Créer le dessin à l’échelle de ce dinosaure était un défi. 
04/10/2026 everythingdinosaur ⚙ Traduction automatique
Nouveaux modèles Haolonggood Purussaurus entrant en stock
Royaume-Uni Miocène Dinosauria Ouranosaurus Spinosauria
Les deux modèles Haolonggood Purussaurus récemment annoncés arrivent en stock chez Everything Dinosaur. La société de vente par correspondance basée au Royaume-Uni stocke déjà les chiffres de Haolonggood Sarcosuchus. Ils constituent un excellent accompagnement pour les modèles Spinosaurus et Ouranosaurus de Haolonggood.  Purussaurus a vécu à l’époque du Miocène. Ce crocodilien est donc géologiquement beaucoup plus jeune que Sarcosuchus. Deux variantes de couleurs
03/10/2026 everythingdinosaur ⚙ Traduction automatique
Pourquoi différents modèles de dinosaures du même animal semblent-ils différents ?
Dinosauria Stegosauria
Si vous collectionnez des modèles de dinosaures et d’animaux préhistoriques, vous avez peut-être remarqué quelque chose de curieux. Deux modèles représentant exactement le même dinosaure peuvent paraître étonnamment différents. La disposition des plaques de blindage sur un stégosaure peut différer.  Une figurine de T. rex peut être lourdement bâtie avec des hanches extrêmement larges, tandis qu'un autre modèle peut paraître plus mince.  UN
02/10/2026 everythingdinosaur ⚙ Traduction automatique
Dinosaur-Era Mammal Swam Like Platypus and Replaced Its Teeth Multiple Times
Un mammifère de l’ère des dinosaures a nagé comme un ornithorynque et a remplacé ses dents plusieurs fois
Chine Dinosauria mammifères
Dongoconodon platycauda, ​​un petit mammifère eutriconodonte qui vivait aux côtés des dinosaures dans ce qui est aujourd'hui le nord-est de la Chine, pagayait dans l'eau avec des mains et des pieds palmés ressemblant à des ornithorynques, et remplaçait ses dents à plusieurs reprises. L'article Un mammifère de l'ère des dinosaures a nagé comme un ornithorynque et a remplacé ses dents plusieurs fois est apparu en premier sur Sci.News : Breaking Science News.
01/10/2026 sci-news ⚙ Traduction automatique
Dinosaurs May Have Dined on Seaweed, Study Suggests
Les dinosaures auraient pu manger des algues, selon une étude
Crétacé fossile Dinosauria isotope étude
Les paléontologues qui étudient les fossiles du Crétacé ont découvert à plusieurs reprises que les dents de nombreux animaux anciens contiennent davantage d'un isotope de carbone plus lourd, le carbone 13, que ce que leur régime alimentaire présumé à base de plantes laisserait présager. L'article Les dinosaures ont peut-être dîné d'algues, selon une étude, est apparu en premier sur Sci.News : Breaking Science News.
01/10/2026 sci-news ⚙ Traduction automatique
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50